The Question of the Free Will

 I'm done with it quickly.  "The will is free"  sounds like  a   never ending dead end street." The dead end road may continue as long as it builds itself. The will is as free as it is allowing itself. The will's will is law, in complete freedom.  In short: there's nothing free about the will and so is the desire for freedom  not free, otherwise there was no will. (Of course this is a bit of a silly word game, so you have to investigate the question of the free will.)

Self-examination

 You must investigate your own will.  Where does actually start your will ?   When do you want something? Who is the boss about your wanting ? There has been much research showing that our decisions can not be aware if the brains hadn't already taken a decision.  From this I can possible conclude that the brains, part of the body, makes decisions for the body. The body is been  thought  ( made up)  by those brains.The brains (and body) are thinking themselves. ( creating themselves.) This must sound very weird, but imagine.. where would your body be without your brains to experience your body ?

When I investigated my free will I bothered myself daily with questions, like:  which way do I take to school?  What will I eat?  What do I do now? Why am I doing this ?  Why do I think like this? HOw come it looked like as if I choose this way ?

It really looks like as if my decisions come from emotions and a continuous searching for a balanced body. (Which is also a thought again, of course) The choice is determined by the path of leastresistance, the path of desire for physical gratification. Very basically, very primary. The  body  and the environment ( which both are created by thoughts) seem more "my will" to determine my 'free will'. My thoughts about what I want are just mind fucking reactions.

( For example every evening after dinner I want to eat a sandwich with chocolate and why do I want this? I want this because my body likes the taste of it. But I don't want a sandwich with chocolate and why not ? Because I got sick of it in the night and I got fat. So what do I really want ? I think I can choose, but my Self struggles all the time "shall I eat - no don't ! - yes I 'll eat - no don't ! - so I really can't make my mind up. Finally I shall choose the most easy way, the way of least resistance: the sandwich is blissful eaten. How big the struggle was, I could make just one choice and I couldn't help it. There is always one choice possible and that depends on the addiction to experiences of bliss and happiness. )

 In other words, behavior (including all so-called 'choices') is always the product of an infinitely power game, where all sorts of influences and tendencies (apparently) lead to a certain outcome. . And in that power game there's no no ultimately choosing core, though it seems that way.  Self-examination may reveal that that seemingly choosing core shape is a fictional ghost.

The paradox

. Whether the will is  free or not, Thinking doesn't matter , as long as it continues to believe in his own thinking.  As long as it continues to believe in free will. . Or in the not free will. . It's just whatever you like of course ... This is because you won't find Truth in this kind of concepts.

The truth is not found in freedom, as long as this freedom is a concept of an opposite . If you look closely at the term 'free will', then in there  hides the truth: Freedom and Will are both contrived concepts so you can move as an identity  in the appropriate space and time. Isn't that a wonderful creation? The art is to look at both concepts without taking part in a centuries-old debate that will continue indefinitely as long as is not seen that Freedom and Will are unfinished separated united.

Therefore, I recommend: just believe what you particularly suits! That's really unconditioned and liberating!  This is immediately the paradox: because you are in reality the Freedom itself, you already believe what good is for you !  This is not a doer. Faith - not faith - doubt, all concepts that are completely self-regulated. Openness is the key.

 Finally, if you investigate "free will" you can never exclude the researcher. . You ARE what you are researching.  Researchers who examine a definition of "consciousness" will always linger around in the mind. Consciousness is therefore an unexplored area by definition.